BlueLandscape · Invoicing · vs WeFact
BlueLandscape Invoicing vs WeFact.
The closest comparison — both are pure invoicing tools for the Dutch SMB. Different shape, different pricing. Honest comparison from the team building BlueLandscape.
Two focused tools, different choices
WeFact and BlueLandscape both specialise in invoicing — not full accounting, not ERP, not 100 features you don't use. In that sense we're each other's closest comparison. The difference is the shape:
WeFact uses forms, fixed-tier pricing, and a mature feature set built over years: customer portal, automated dunning, subscription billing module, integrations with major accounting packages. BlueLandscape is much younger and works differently: everything through an AI conversation, pay-per-use, and expanding into a suite of other tools (customer interviews and time-logging are live; CRM, hour-management, and project-management on the roadmap).
Where WeFact wins
- Mature customer portal. Clients log in, view open invoices, pay online, download history. For B2B with larger customers that's a real trust signal.
- Automated dunning. Configurable reminder flows built in — no extra tool needed.
- Subscription/recurring billing module. For freelancers with recurring invoicing (monthly contracts, hosting, retainers), WeFact has a built-in subscription engine. We don't.
- Integrations with NL accounting packages. WeFact ties into the major Dutch accounting tools. We send UBL/Peppol with each invoice — that's the integration.
- Stability + track record. WeFact has been running for years with an established customer base. We're younger.
Where we win
- Speed of creating an invoice. "Invoice ACME for 16 hours senior consulting at €125." One sentence, invoice ready. WeFact's form-flow is faster than Moneybird's but still meaningful clicking for a simple invoice.
- Price for low volume. €0.20 per invoice. Above ~60/month WeFact's fixed subscription wins. Below that, we're cheaper.
- UBL/Peppol on every invoice. Included at every level. WeFact offers it, but tier-dependent.
- AI drafting + correction. Need a tweak? "Make that line €110 instead of €125" — done. No field to hunt down and refill.
- Shared client base with our other tools. The companies and persons you invoice are the same ones you use in customer interviews and time-logging (both live). One address book for the whole suite.
Migrating from WeFact
Not yet one-click. Export clients + products from WeFact, ask the AI in chat to create them (or paste from CSV — bulk import is on the roadmap), and start a fresh invoice number sequence. Existing WeFact invoices stay viewable in WeFact as long as you keep that account active.
Side by side
| Feature | BlueLandscape | WeFact |
|---|---|---|
| Invoice creation | ✓ (conversation) | ✓ (forms) |
| UBL/Peppol on every send | ✓ included | tier-dependent |
| AI drafting | ✓ | — |
| Customer portal | — (verify URL only) | ✓ |
| Automated dunning | — (roadmap) | ✓ |
| Subscriptions/recurring | — | ✓ |
| Customer interviews / other tools | ✓ | — |
| Shared client base across tools | ✓ | — |
| Price (10 invoices/month) | €2.00 | €10–15 |
Our honest take
If you have a B2B clientele that expects a real customer portal, or you structurally have a lot of overdue invoices you want to chase automatically, or you have a subscription business model with recurring billing: stay with WeFact. Our versions of those features come later — today, we don't have them.
If you're a freelancer or small team with manageable invoice volume (10–30/month), want an AI that drafts the invoice in one sentence, and already use our other tools (or see value in them coming): BlueLandscape is the choice. Cheaper for what you send, and expandable.